Sunday, January 10, 2010
War Veteran
Friday, January 8, 2010
Free
Careers are a 20th century invention,
Give me some time and space
Ill make a difference at my own pace
We'd be so free,ruler of no land,
with no masterkey,only a helping hand
We'd be so free,a ruler of no land,
We'd be so free,a ruler of no man
Lifes to short to snort the mans drug
Get up off your blood stained prayer rug
Take your time to find the one
No heavenly father only a sun
We'd be so free,a ruler of no land,
with no masterkey,only a helping hand
We'd be so free,a ruler of no land,
We'd be so free,a ruler of no man
Modern Day Disaster
Monday, January 4, 2010
THE NEW RELIGION
The New Religion
“We used to have to pay our way to not go to hell and what a money maker that was for the religious institutions. Now we have to pay to a tax to be able exhale carbon...Money baby!”- the dude
Now Im all for cleaning up the world,the oceans and the saving the rainforest.But what Iam NOT for is a manipulation of science and using fear mongering ,something our governments of the world use oh so well to get us inline with there political, profitable and power hungry agendas.
Greenpeace . At the forefront of the environmental movement championed many of its causes such as opposition to nuclear testing, protection of whales and the rainforest .All stemmed from there scientific knowledge in nuclear physics and marine biology. Patrick Moore is the co-founder and once was the leader of the environmental activist organization. But within 6 short years he stepped away from the planet saving organization. He observed during this time that his fellow directors had no education in the sciences. They were either political activists or environmental entrepreneurs. Along with a trend towards abandoning scientific objectivity in favour of political agendas. All of this forced out a true environmental activist in 1986.Greenpeace has sadly evolved into an organization of extremism and politically motivated agendas. Most of the people working, volunteering at the front lines believe what they are fighting for is going to benefit the planet thus save the human race from self destruction. Looking at the big picture nothing could be further from the truth. What’s being fuelled is political agendas and policies such as a carbon taxation along with a cap and trade system. Now before I get into the cap and trade and carbon tax (what all living things and the oceans emit into the atmosphere and what plants breath in to survive and recycle into oxygen) I want to take a look at the new leader in global warming publishing, aswell having the incriminating Climate-gate scandal attached to it,which is getting some but not nearly enough attention around the world it needs.Should we be surprised.Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the...
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
An intergovernmental body the IPCC was established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP).Both bodies within the United Nations.Oh I almost forgot the IPCC also shared the Nobel Peace prize with the former Vice-president of the United States in 2007.For doing an excellent job in publishing data and putting a heavy sack of profits in Al Gores hands . To understand exactly what the IPCC does it is easier to be explained by what they do not do.The IPCC does not carry its own original research,nor do they do the work of monitoring climate change or related phenomena itself.There main activity is publishing reports on topics relevant to the implementation of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).Most recently added to there to do list for the powers that be is to manipulate, hide and destroy raw data.Not only is this evident in the Climate gate scandal of late 2009 but aswell as the IPCC second assessment report on climate change.December 20, 1995, Reuters report quoted British scientist Keith Shine, one of IPCC's lead authors, discussing the Policymakers' Summary. He said: "We produce a draft, and then the policymakers go through it line by line and change the way it is presented.... It's peculiar that they have the final say in what goes into a scientists' report" It is not clear, in this case, whether Shine was complaining that the report had been changed to be more skeptical, or less, or something else entirely.
Solid-state physicist Frederick Seitz, president emeritus of Rockefeller University, past president of the National Academy of Sciences, and former health consultant for R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company publicly denounced the IPCC report, writing "I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report". He opposed it in the Leipzig Declaration of S. Fred Singer's Science and Environmental Policy Project.
In turn, Seitz's comments were vigorously opposed by the presidents of the American Meteorological Society and University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, who wrote about a "systematic effort by some individuals to undermine and discredit the scientific process that has led many scientists working on understanding climate to conclude that there is a very real possibility that humans are modifying Earth's climate on a global scale. Rather than carrying out a legitimate scientific debate... they are waging in the public media a vocal campaign against scientific results with which they disagree"
S. Fred Singer disseminated a letter about Chapter 8 of the IPCC Working Group I report, asserting that
1. Chapter 8 was altered substantially to make it conform to the Summary;
2. Three key clauses — expressing the consensus of authors, contributors, and reviewers — should have been placed into the Summary instead of being deleted from the approved draft chapter
Now as for the Climate gate scandal there are hundreds upon hundreds of incriminating emails sent back and forth between scientific publishers in the IPCC. In order to save space and virtual paper I will let you, the reader, do your own research. Simply the IPCC is not scientifically driven but politically driven at the same time giving true scientists around the world a bad wrap.For they are the ones who we trust to inform with honesty and integrity.Ask any scientist who isn’t politically funded and you will begin to see a very obvious deception in the global warming reports.The power that be say higher carbon equals higher temperatures.It is actually the opposite. True science shows us higher temperatures equals more carbon, inturn fueling growth in vegetation.Another obvious one is the sun and its cycles.The earth has always and will always go through climate change regardless of human activity.To say climate change is a direct result of human carbon emissions and calling it a pollutant is just irresponsibly false.But don’t take anyones word for it wheather its Mr.Gore or Joe scientist down the street. DO your own research in any debate, especially one that has such an enormous impact on our lives.This propaganda of man made global warming is massively influential at a global level.Most people don’t understand the science of it but get behind a movement cause there told there doing the right thing as a global citizen.”Do not take authority as the Truth but Truth as the authority”-some dude
FOLLOW THE MONEY
To be continued...